At 3 days shy of 6 months, Amy has had her first solids. I was hoping to wait until she was 6 months as I didn't think she was quite ready; well what did I know?! In true baby led weaning style, she persistently grabbed at some of my toast today so I decided to take that for what it was - an interest in food - and set her up with some of her own.
Oh boy was it ever a success! I gave her toast with Philadelphia, a few chunks of cheddar and a bit of banana and she went nuts (after first exploring the spoon and bib, obviously).
Claudia got really confused, bless her. She has had 6 months of "Amy doesn't have lunch like us, she has booby milk" and couldn't understand why all of a sudden her little sister was eating toast! She came over and nicked a piece for herself, then offered Amy a bit. And when I say "offered", I of course mean "shoved in her mouth"... When I explained we had to be gentle, she then handed it to her instead. Gosh those two make my heart melt sometimes ♥
Honestly, I'd forgotten how much fun it can be; it's been over 2 years since I last did this. Amy had great fun grabbing at the food and shoving it in the general direction of her mouth. Actually, I was quite impressed with her coordination: once she had a firm grip on the food it pretty much always ended up in her mouth. I'm sure Claudia had more trouble than this but then my memory is probably rather skewed. Either way, Mummy was wrong: she clearly
is ready for solids
☺
Last night I was having a flick through the
BLW book by Gill Rapley to try and refresh my memory on 'how to wean'. Well after looking through the whole thing I remembered that there
is no 'how to', it's truly led by the baby; give them food and let them at it! There are no 'stages', no list of foods they allowed only at certain ages, no gradual progression to lumpier and lumpier foods and, best of all, no puréeing! I am inherently lazy so that suits me just fine; all I have to do is make our dinner as usual and make sure that any large bits are cut into manageable 'finger's for her and that's it! Best of all, I know that she's getting all the nutrition she needs from my milk so I am not worried about the old "are you getting enough into her?" questions that inevitably follow the baby-led approach. At this age, food is a complement to milk; it's a toy to be explored and learned about but is in no way vital to their growth.

Strangest of all, perhaps, is since doing the baby-led weaning with Claudia, I can't see why anyone would do the purées... Unless your baby is struggling to gain weight I suppose (but even then, milk is so much more nutritious, and purées tend to start out with foods you'd eat if you were on a diet anyway - fruits and veggies!) but it just seems so backwards. You start before they're developmentally able to feed themselves, which means you have to spoonfeed them (which inevitably means you choose how much they eat and when); and then you have to re-teach them how to feed themselves so that by the time they reach toddlerhood they are feeding themselves again. To me the logical progression seems to be: breastfeeding (where baby feeds themself 'on demand' and chooses how much to take), fingerfoods, normal meals. Anyway, I know BLW isn't for everyone but it just makes so much sense to me that I now couldn't imagine doing it any other way.

Claudia has proven that BLW results in a child that actually enjoys food. We have no meal-time battles with our 2 year old; if she doesn't want to eat what's on offer then we don't force her, some days she just isn't very hungry and that's ok. She hasn't starved yet! When she does eat, she does so happily and at her own pace and isn't that how it should be? It's a lot easier second time around; even though it's a bit of an unusual approach to weaning, I am confident because I've done it all before and I know it works, I know she won't starve and that will help me ignore the nay-sayers.
I can't wait for dinner tonight!